Paper detail

Modeling rf breakdown arcs

We describe breakdown in 805 MHz rf accelerator cavities in terms of a number of self consistent mechanisms. We divide the breakdown process into three stages: 1) we model surface failure using molecular dynamics of fracture caused by electrostatic tensile stress, 2) we model the ionization of neutrals responsible for plasma initiation and plasma growth using a particle in cell code, and 3) we model surface damage by assuming a process similar to unipolar arcing. We find that the cold, dense plasma in contact with the surface produces very small Debye lengths and very high electric fields over a large area, consistent with unipolar arc behavior, although unipolar arcs are strictly defined with equipotential boundaries. These high fields produce strong erosion mechanisms, primarily self sputtering, compatible with the crater formation that we see. We use OOPIC modeling to estimate very high surface electric fields in the dense plasma and measure these field using electrohydrodynamic arguments to relate the dimensions of surface damage with the applied electric field. We also present a geometrical explanation of the large enhancement factors of field emitters.This is consistent with the apparent absence of whiskers on surfaces exposed to high fields. The enhancement factors we derive, when combined with the Fowler-Nordheim analysis produce a consistent picture of breakdown and field emission from surfaces at local fields of 7 - 10 GV/m. We show that the plasma growth rates we obtain from OOPIC are consistent with growth rates of the cavity shorting currents using x ray measurements. We believe the general picture presented here for rf breakdown arcs should be directly applicable to a larger class of vacuum arcs. Results from the plasma simulation are included as a guide to experimental verification of this model.

preprint2011arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.