Paper detail

Modeling Optical Polarization Evolution in Myelinated Axon Waveguides with Realistic Imperfections

Biophotonic signaling via axons has been proposed as a potential mode of neural communication, where information might be encoded not only in photon number and wavelength but also in polarization. Although earlier computational studies have examined how structural imperfections influence optical transmission, their effects on polarization fidelity remain unexplored; previous modeling of polarization fidelity in myelinated axons has largely focused on idealized geometries. This study incorporates three structural imperfections characteristic of axons in vivo: variation in myelin thickness, non-circular cross-sectional geometry, and axonal bending, within a model that includes four nodes of Ranvier. We find that variation in myelin thickness alone has minimal impact on fidelity, while non-circular cross-sections show strong mode dependence. Axonal bending has the most significant influence, generating large fluctuations and deep fidelity dips. When all imperfections are combined in a single axon model, the simulations show substantial drops in fidelity, yet certain modes exhibit recovery, with repeated revivals reaching values of around 0.8, which exceeds the revivals observed in the single imperfection cases. Overall, the results indicate that although structural imperfections affect polarization, polarization-based biophotonic signals might remain recoverable even in realistic axons, lending support to the plausibility of polarization-based biophotonic signaling in the brain.

preprint2026arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.