Researcher profile

Ethan Davies

Ethan Davies contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 11 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
1works
0followers
1topics
2close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

1 published item(s)

preprint2026arXiv

Modeling Optical Polarization Evolution in Myelinated Axon Waveguides with Realistic Imperfections

Biophotonic signaling via axons has been proposed as a potential mode of neural communication, where information might be encoded not only in photon number and wavelength but also in polarization. Although earlier computational studies have examined how structural imperfections influence optical transmission, their effects on polarization fidelity remain unexplored; previous modeling of polarization fidelity in myelinated axons has largely focused on idealized geometries. This study incorporates three structural imperfections characteristic of axons in vivo: variation in myelin thickness, non-circular cross-sectional geometry, and axonal bending, within a model that includes four nodes of Ranvier. We find that variation in myelin thickness alone has minimal impact on fidelity, while non-circular cross-sections show strong mode dependence. Axonal bending has the most significant influence, generating large fluctuations and deep fidelity dips. When all imperfections are combined in a single axon model, the simulations show substantial drops in fidelity, yet certain modes exhibit recovery, with repeated revivals reaching values of around 0.8, which exceeds the revivals observed in the single imperfection cases. Overall, the results indicate that although structural imperfections affect polarization, polarization-based biophotonic signals might remain recoverable even in realistic axons, lending support to the plausibility of polarization-based biophotonic signaling in the brain.