Paper detail

Modeling how social network algorithms can influence opinion polarization

Among different aspects of social networks, dynamics have been proposed to simulate how opinions can be transmitted. In this study, we propose a model that simulates the communication in an online social network, in which the posts are created from external information. We considered the nodes and edges of a network as users and their friendship, respectively. A real number is associated with each user representing its opinion. The dynamics starts with a user that has contact with a random opinion, and, according to a given probability function, this individual can post this opinion. This step is henceforth called post transmission. In the next step, called post distribution, another probability function is employed to select the user's friends that could see the post. Post transmission and distribution represent the user and the social network algorithm, respectively. If an individual has contact with a post, its opinion can be attracted or repulsed. Furthermore, individuals that are repulsed can change their friendship through a rewiring. These steps are executed various times until the dynamics converge. Several impressive results were obtained, which include the formation of scenarios of polarization and consensus of opinions. In the case of echo chambers, the possibility of rewiring probability is found to be decisive. However, for particular network topologies, with a well-defined community structure, this effect can also happen. All in all, the results indicate that the post distribution strategy is crucial to mitigate or promote polarization.

preprint2021arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.