Paper detail

Modeling discrete common-shock risks through matrix distributions

We introduce a novel class of bivariate common-shock discrete phase-type (CDPH) distributions to describe dependencies in loss modeling, with an emphasis on those induced by common shocks. By constructing two jointly evolving terminating Markov chains that share a common evolution up to a random time corresponding to the common shock component, and then proceed independently, we capture the essential features of risk events influenced by shared and individual-specific factors. We derive explicit expressions for the joint distribution of the termination times and prove various class and distributional properties, facilitating tractable analysis of the risks. Extending this framework, we model random sums where aggregate claims are sums of continuous phase-type random variables with counts determined by these termination times, and show that their joint distribution belongs to the multivariate phase-type or matrix-exponential class. We develop estimation procedures for the CDPH distributions using the expectation-maximization algorithm and demonstrate the applicability of our models through simulation studies and an application to bivariate insurance claim frequency data.

preprint2025arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.