Paper detail

Modeling and Predicting Blood Flow Characteristics through Double Stenosed Artery from CFD simulation using Deep Learning Models

Establishing patient-specific finite element analysis (FEA) models for computational fluid dynamics (CFD) of double stenosed artery models involves time and effort, restricting physicians' ability to respond quickly in time-critical medical applications. Such issues might be addressed by training deep learning (DL) models to learn and predict blood flow characteristics using a dataset generated by CFD simulations of simplified double stenosed artery models with different configurations. When blood flow patterns are compared through an actual double stenosed artery model, derived from IVUS imaging, it is revealed that the sinusoidal approximation of stenosed neck geometry, which has been widely used in previous research works, fails to effectively represent the effects of a real constriction. As a result, a novel geometric representation of the constricted neck is proposed which, in terms of a generalized simplified model, outperforms the former assumption. The sequential change in artery lumen diameter and flow parameters along the length of the vessel presented opportunities for the use of LSTM and GRU DL models. However, with the small dataset of short lengths of doubly constricted blood arteries, the basic neural network model outperforms the specialized RNNs for most flow properties. LSTM, on the other hand, performs better for predicting flow properties with large fluctuations, such as varying blood pressure over the length of the vessels. Despite having good overall accuracies in training and testing across all the properties for the vessels in the dataset, the GRU model underperforms for an individual vessel flow prediction in all cases. The results also point to the need of individually optimized hyperparameters for each property in any model rather than aiming to achieve overall good performance across all outputs with a single set of hyperparameters.

preprint2021arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.