Paper detail

Model selection of stochastic simulation algorithm based on generalized divergence measures

MCMC methods (Monte Carlo Markov Chain) are a class of methods used to perform simulations per a probability distribution $P$. These methods are often used when we have difficulties to directly sample per a given probability distribution $P$ . This distribution is then considered as a target and generates a Markov chain $(X_n)_{n\in\mathbb{N}}$ that, when $n$ is large we have $X_n\sim P$. These MCMC methods consist of several simulation strategies including the \emph{Independent Sampler (IS)}, the \emph{Random Walk of Metropolis Hastings \small{(RWMH)}}, the \emph{Gibbs sampler}, the \emph{Adaptive Metropolis (AM)} and \emph{Metropolis Within Gibbs (MWG)} strategy. Each of these strategies can generate a Markov chain and is associated with a convergence speed. It is interesting, with a given target law, to compare several simulation strategies for determining the best. Chauveau and Vandekerkhove \cite{Chauv2007} have compared IS and RWMH strategies using the Kullback-Leibler divergence measure. In our article we will compare our five simulation methods already mentioned using generalized divergence measures. These divergence measures are taken in family of $α$-divergence measures \cite{Cichocki2010}, with a parameter $α$. This is the Rényi divergence, Tsallis divergence and $D_α$ divergence .

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.