Paper detail

Model Independent Determination of $HWW$ coupling and Higgs total width at ILC

This article is based on the talk presented at the International Workshop on Future Linear Colliders (LCWS13) which held during November 11-15, 2013 at Tokyo, Japan. We present several analyses related to the Higgs total width study at ILC based on the full detector simulation of ILD, which are \eevvH followed by \Htobb and \HtoWW. The studies show that at $\unit{250}{GeV}$ we can determine the Higgs total width with a relative precision of 11% and the $HWW$ coupling with 4.8%, whereas at $\unit{500}{GeV}$ the expected precision can be significantly improved to 5% and 1.2% respectively, assuming the baseline integrated luminosities of ILC, which are $\unit{250}{fb^{-1}}$ @ $\unit{250}{GeV}$, $\unit{500}{fb^{-1}}$ @ $\unit{500}{GeV}$, and a beam polarization of $P(e^{-},e^{+})=(-80%,+30%)$. A new approach of removing pile-up particles based on multivariate method developed during those analyses is also presented.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.