Paper detail

Model-free consistency of graph partitioning

In this paper, we exploit the theory of dense graph limits to provide a new framework to study the stability of graph partitioning methods, which we call structural consistency. Both stability under perturbation as well as asymptotic consistency (i.e., convergence with probability $1$ as the sample size goes to infinity under a fixed probability model) follow from our notion of structural consistency. By formulating structural consistency as a continuity result on the graphon space, we obtain robust results that are completely independent of the data generating mechanism. In particular, our results apply in settings where observations are not independent, thereby significantly generalizing the common probabilistic approach where data are assumed to be i.i.d. In order to make precise the notion of structural consistency of graph partitioning, we begin by extending the theory of graph limits to include vertex colored graphons. We then define continuous node-level statistics and prove that graph partitioning based on such statistics is consistent. Finally, we derive the structural consistency of commonly used clustering algorithms in a general model-free setting. These include clustering based on local graph statistics such as homomorphism densities, as well as the popular spectral clustering using the normalized Laplacian. We posit that proving the continuity of clustering algorithms in the graph limit topology can stand on its own as a more robust form of model-free consistency. We also believe that the mathematical framework developed in this paper goes beyond the study of clustering algorithms, and will guide the development of similar model-free frameworks to analyze other procedures in the broader mathematical sciences.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors4 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.