Paper detail

Model form uncertainty quantification of Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes modeling of flows over a SD7003 airfoil

It is well known that the Boussinesq turbulent viscosity hypothesis can yield inaccurate predictions when complex f low features are involved, e.g. laminar-turbulent transition. The focus of the study is to explore the capability of a physics-based uncertainty quantification (UQ) approach to quantify the model-form uncertainty in Reynolds-averaged Naiver-Stokes (RANS) simulations of laminar-turbulent transitional flows over an Selig-Donovan (SD) 7003 airfoil. This methodology perturbs the modeled Reynolds stress tensor in the momentum equations; perturbations are injected into the amplitude, eigenvalues and eigenvectors of the anisotropy Reynolds stress tensor undergone an eigen-decomposition. In this study, our analyses focus upon the amplitude perturbation. We observed a monotonic behavior of the magnitude of the predicted uncertainty bounds for different quantities of interest. High-order regressions based on the turbulence kinetic energy discrepancies are used to develop a novel switch marker function Mk to introduce perturbations in a non-uniform manner over different regions of the domain based upon prior knowledge of the limitations of the model. Importantly, the compound effect of Mk and eigenvalue perturbations show a synergy behavior, e.g., dramatically increased uncertainty bounds to account for the discrepancy in the RANS prediction; and the Mk function effectively avoids over-perturbation to the amplitude of the anisotropy Reynolds stress tensor. In this context, regression based amplitude perturbation of the anisotropy Reynolds stress tensor makes a new contribution to the RANS UQ methodology in the simulations of the airfoil transitional flows, which shows very encouraging results.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.