Paper detail

Mobility versus quality in 2D semiconductor structures

We consider theoretically effects of random charged impurity disorder on the {\it quality} of high-mobility two dimensional (2D) semiconductor structures, explicitly demonstrating that the sample mobility is not necessarily a reliable or universal indicator of the sample quality in high-mobility modulation-doped 2D GaAs structures because, depending on the specific system property of interest, mobility and quality may be controlled by different aspects of the underlying disorder distribution, particularly since these systems are dominated by long-range Coulomb disorder from both near and far random quenched charged impurities. We show that in the presence of both channel and remote charged impurity scattering, which is a generic situation in modulation-doped high-mobility 2D carrier systems, it is quite possible for higher (lower) mobility structures to have lower (higher) quality as measured by the disorder-induced single-particle level broadening. In particular, we establish that there is no reason to expect a unique relationship between mobility and quality in 2D semiconductor structures as both are independent functionals of the disorder distribution, and are therefore, in principle, independent of each other. Using a simple, but reasonably realistic, ``2-impurity'' minimal model of the disorder distribution, we provide concrete examples of situations where higher (lower) mobilities correspond to lower (higher) sample qualities. We discuss experimental implications of our theoretical results and comment on possible strategies for future improvement of 2D sample quality.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.