Paper detail

MLPro: A System for Hosting Crowdsourced Machine Learning Challenges for Open-Ended Research Problems

The task of developing a machine learning (ML) model for a particular problem is inherently open-ended, and there is an unbounded set of possible solutions. Steps of the ML development pipeline, such as feature engineering, loss function specification, data imputation, and dimensionality reduction, require the engineer to consider an extensive and often infinite array of possibilities. Successfully identifying high-performing solutions for an unfamiliar dataset or problem requires a mix of mathematical prowess and creativity applied towards inventing and repurposing novel ML methods. Here, we explore the feasibility of hosting crowdsourced ML challenges to facilitate a breadth-first exploration of open-ended research problems, thereby expanding the search space of problem solutions beyond what a typical ML team could viably investigate. We develop MLPro, a system which combines the notion of open-ended ML coding problems with the concept of an automatic online code judging platform. To conduct a pilot evaluation of this paradigm, we crowdsource several open-ended ML challenges to ML and data science practitioners. We describe results from two separate challenges. We find that for sufficiently unconstrained and complex problems, many experts submit similar solutions, but some experts provide unique solutions which outperform the "typical" solution class. We suggest that automated expert crowdsourcing systems such as MLPro have the potential to accelerate ML engineering creativity.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.