Paper detail

MixML: A Unified Analysis of Weakly Consistent Parallel Learning

Parallelism is a ubiquitous method for accelerating machine learning algorithms. However, theoretical analysis of parallel learning is usually done in an algorithm- and protocol-specific setting, giving little insight about how changes in the structure of communication could affect convergence. In this paper we propose MixML, a general framework for analyzing convergence of weakly consistent parallel machine learning. Our framework includes: (1) a unified way of modeling the communication process among parallel workers; (2) a new parameter, the mixing time tmix, that quantifies how the communication process affects convergence; and (3) a principled way of converting a convergence proof for a sequential algorithm into one for a parallel version that depends only on tmix. We show MixML recovers and improves on known convergence bounds for asynchronous and/or decentralized versions of many algorithms, includingSGD and AMSGrad. Our experiments substantiate the theory and show the dependency of convergence on the underlying mixing time.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.