Paper detail

Mixing detection on Bitcoin transactions using statistical patterns

Cryptocurrencies gained lots of attention mainly because of the anonymous way of online payment, which they suggested. Meanwhile, Bitcoin and other major cryptocurrencies have experienced severe deanonymization attacks. To address these attacks, Bitcoin contributors introduced services called mixers or tumblers. Mixing or laundry services aim to return anonymity back to the network. In this research, we tackle the problem of losing the footprint of money in Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies networks caused by the usage of mixing services. We devise methods to track transactions and addresses of these services and the addresses of dirty and cleaned money. Because of the lack of labeled data, we had to transact with these services and prepare labeled data. Using this data, we found reliable patterns and developed an integrated algorithm to detect mixing transactions, mixing addresses, sender addresses, and receiver addresses in the Bitcoin network.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.