Paper detail

Mixing angle of $K_1$ axial vector mesons

Analyses of various experimental measurements all indicate that the mixing angle $θ_{K_1}$ of $K_1(1270)$ and $K_1(1400)$ is in the vicinity of $33^\circ$ or $57^\circ$. However, whether $θ_{K_1}$ is greater or less than $45^\circ$ is still quite controversial. For example, there were two very recent studies of the strong decays of $K_1$ mesons. One group claimed that $θ_{K_1}\approx 60^\circ$, while the other group obtained $θ_{K_1}=(33.6\pm4.3)^\circ$. Since the determination of the mixing angles $α_{^3\!P_1}$ and $α_{^1\!P_1}$ with the former (latter) being the mixing angle of $f_1(1285)$ ($h_1(1170)$) and $f_1(1420)$ ($h_1(1380)$) in the flavor basis through mass relations depend on $θ_{K_1}$, we show that $θ_{K_1}\approx 57^\circ$ is ruled out as it leads to a too large deviation from ideal mixing in the $^1\!P_1$ sector, inconsistent with the lattice calculation of $α_{^1\!P_1}$ and the observation of strong decays of $h_1(1170)$ and $h_1(1380)$. We find that for $θ_{K_1}\approx (28-30)^\circ$, the corresponding $α_{^3\!P_1}$ and $α_{^1\!P_1}$ agree well with all lattice and phenomenological analyses. This again reinforces the statement that $θ_{K_1}\sim 33^\circ$ is much more favored than $57^\circ$.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.