Paper detail

Misleading convergence of the skeleton diagrammatic technique: when the correct solution can be found

Convergence of the self-consistent skeleton diagrammatic technique (SDT) -- in which the full Green's function is determined through summation of Feynman diagrams in terms of itself -- to the wrong answer has been associated with the existence of non-perturbative branches of the Luttinger-Ward functional. Although it has been possible to detect misleading convergence without the knowledge of the exact result, the SDT has remained inapplicable in the regimes where this happens. We show that misleading convergence does not always preclude recovering the exact solution. In addition to the established mechanism, convergence of the SDT to the wrong answer can stem from divergence of the inherent diagrammatic series, which allows us to recover the exact solution by a modified SDT protocol based on controlled analytic continuation. We illustrate this approach by its application to the analytically solvable (0+0)d Hubbard model, the Hubbard atom, and the 2d Hubbard model in a challenging strong-coupling regime, for which the SDT is solved with controlled accuracy by the diagrammatic Monte Carlo (DiagMC) technique.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors4 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.