Paper detail

Mining and evaluation of patients' diagnostic therapeutic paths through state sequences analysis

The concept of care pathways is increasingly being used to enhance the quality of care and to optimize the use of resources for health care. Nevertheless, recommendations regarding the sequence of care are mostly based on consensus-based decisions as there is a lack of evidence on effective treatment sequences. In a real-world setting, classical statistical tools resulted to be insufficient to adequately consider a phenomenon with such high variability and has to be integrated with novel data mining techniques suitable of identifying patterns in complex data structures. Data-driven techniques can potentially support the empirical identification of effective care sequences by extracting them from data collected routinely. The purpose of this study is to perform sequence analysis to identify different patterns of treatment and to assess the most efficient in preventing adverse events. The clinical application that motivated the study of this method concerns the several problems frequently encountered in the quality of care provided in the mental health field. In particular, we analyzed administrative data provided by Regione Lombardia related to all the beneficiaries of the National Health Service with a diagnosis of schizophrenia from 2015 to 2018 resident in Lombardy, a region of northern Italy. This methodology considers the patient's therapeutic path as a conceptual unit, i.e., a sequence, composed of a succession of different states that can describe longitudinal patient's status. This kind of information, such as common patterns of care that allowed us to risk profile patients, can provide health policymakers an opportunity to plan optimum and individualized patient care by allocating appropriate resources, analyzing trends in the health status of a population, and finding the risk factors that can be leveraged to prevent the decline of mental health status at the population level.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.