Paper detail

Minimum-weight Spanning Tree Construction in $O(\log \log \log n)$ Rounds on the Congested Clique

This paper considers the \textit{minimum spanning tree (MST)} problem in the Congested Clique model and presents an algorithm that runs in $O(\log \log \log n)$ rounds, with high probability. Prior to this, the fastest MST algorithm in this model was a deterministic algorithm due to Lotker et al.~(SIAM J on Comp, 2005) from about a decade ago. A key step along the way to designing this MST algorithm is a \textit{connectivity verification} algorithm that not only runs in $O(\log \log \log n)$ rounds with high probability, but also has low message complexity. This allows the fast computation of an MST by running multiple instances of the connectivity verification algorithm in parallel. These results depend on a new edge-sampling theorem, developed in the paper, that says that if each edge $e = \{u, v\}$ is sampled independently with probability $c \log^2 n/\min\{\mbox{degree}(u), \mbox{degree}(v)\}$ (for a large enough constant $c$) then all cuts of size at least $n$ are approximated in the sampled graph. This sampling theorem is inspired by series of papers on graph sparsification via random edge sampling due to Karger~(STOC 1994), Benczúr and Karger~(STOC 1996, arxiv 2002), and Fung et al.~(STOC 2011). The edge sampling techniques in these papers use probabilities that are functions of edge-connectivity or a related measure called edge-strength. For the purposes of this paper, these edge-connectivity measures seem too costly to compute and the main technical contribution of this paper is to show that degree-based edge-sampling suffices to approximate large cuts.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.