Paper detail

Minimum Message Length Clustering Using Gibbs Sampling

The K-Mean and EM algorithms are popular in clustering and mixture modeling, due to their simplicity and ease of implementation. However, they have several significant limitations. Both coverage to a local optimum of their respective objective functions (ignoring the uncertainty in the model space), require the apriori specification of the number of classes/clsuters, and are inconsistent. In this work we overcome these limitations by using the Minimum Message Length (MML) principle and a variation to the K-Means/EM observation assignment and parameter calculation scheme. We maintain the simplicity of these approaches while constructing a Bayesian mixture modeling tool that samples/searches the model space using a Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) sampler known as a Gibbs sampler. Gibbs sampling allows us to visit each model according to its posterior probability. Therefore, if the model space is multi-modal we will visit all models and not get stuck in local optima. We call our approach multiple chains at equilibrium (MCE) MML sampling.

preprint2013arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.