Paper detail

Minimum length path decompositions

We consider a bi-criteria generalization of the pathwidth problem, where, for given integers $k,l$ and a graph $G$, we ask whether there exists a path decomposition $\cP$ of $G$ such that the width of $\cP$ is at most $k$ and the number of bags in $\cP$, i.e., the \emph{length} of $\cP$, is at most $l$. We provide a complete complexity classification of the problem in terms of $k$ and $l$ for general graphs. Contrary to the original pathwidth problem, which is fixed-parameter tractable with respect to $k$, we prove that the generalized problem is NP-complete for any fixed $k\geq 4$, and is also NP-complete for any fixed $l\geq 2$. On the other hand, we give a polynomial-time algorithm that, for any (possibly disconnected) graph $G$ and integers $k\leq 3$ and $l>0$, constructs a path decomposition of width at most $k$ and length at most $l$, if any exists. As a by-product, we obtain an almost complete classification of the problem in terms of $k$ and $l$ for connected graphs. Namely, the problem is NP-complete for any fixed $k\geq 5$ and it is polynomial-time for any $k\leq 3$. This leaves open the case $k=4$ for connected graphs.

preprint2013arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.