Paper detail

Minimum Enclosing Ball Revisited: Stability and Sub-linear Time Algorithms

In this paper, we revisit the Minimum Enclosing Ball (MEB) problem and its robust version, MEB with outliers, in Euclidean space $\mathbb{R}^d$. Though the problem has been extensively studied before, most of the existing algorithms need at least linear time (in the number of input points $n$ and the dimensionality $d$) to achieve a $(1+ε)$-approximation. Motivated by some recent developments on beyond worst-case analysis, we introduce the notion of stability for MEB (with outliers), which is natural and easy to understand. Roughly speaking, an instance of MEB is stable, if the radius of the resulting ball cannot be significantly reduced by removing a small fraction of the input points. Under the stability assumption, we present two sampling algorithms for computing approximate MEB with sample complexities independent of the number of input points $n$. In particular, the second algorithm has the sample complexity even independent of the dimensionality $d$. Further, we extend the idea to achieve a sub-linear time approximation algorithm for the MEB with outliers problem. Note that most existing sub-linear time algorithms for the problems of MEB and MEB with outliers usually result in bi-criteria approximations, where the "bi-criteria" means that the solution has to allow the approximations on the radius and the number of covered points. Differently, all the algorithms proposed in this paper yield single-criterion approximations (with respect to radius). We expect that our proposed notion of stability and techniques will be applicable to design sub-linear time algorithms for other optimization problems.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Authors

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.