Paper detail

Minimum Cost Multicuts for Incorrect Landmark Edge Detection in Pose-graph SLAM

Pose-graph SLAM is the de facto standard framework for constructing large-scale maps from multi-session experiences of relative observations and motions during visual robot navigation. It has received increasing attention in the context of recent advanced SLAM frameworks such as graph neural SLAM. One remaining challenge is landmark misrecognition errors (i.e., incorrect landmark edges) that can have catastrophic effects on the inferred pose-graph map. In this study, we present comprehensive criteria to maximize global consistency in the pose graph using a new robust graph cut technique. Our key idea is to formulate the problem as a minimum-cost multi-cut that enables us to optimize not only landmark correspondences but also the number of landmarks while allowing for a varying number of landmarks. This makes our proposed approach invariant against the type of landmark measurement, graph topology, and metric information, such as the speed of the robot motion. The proposed graph cut technique was integrated into a practical SLAM framework and verified experimentally using the public NCLT dataset.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.