Paper detail

Minimum Anisotropy of a Magnetic Nanoparticle out of Equilibrium

In this article we study magnetotransport in single nanoparticles of Ni, Py=Ni$_{0.8}$Fe$_{0.2}$, Co, and Fe, with volumes $15\pm 6$nm$^3$, using sequential electron tunneling at 4.2K temperature. We measure current versus magnetic field in the ensembles of nominally the same samples, and obtain the abundances of magnetic hysteresis. The hysteresis abundance varies among the metals as Ni:Py:Co:Fe=4\,:50\,:100\,:100(\%), in good correlation with the magnetostatic and magnetocrystalline anisotropy. The abrupt change in the hysteresis abundance among these metals suggests a concept of minimum magnetic anisotropy required for magnetic hysteresis, which is found to be $\approx 13$meV. The minimum anisotropy is explained in terms of the residual magnetization noise arising from the spin-orbit torques generated by sequential electron tunneling. The magnetic hysteresis abundances are weakly dependent on the tunneling current through the nanoparticle, which we attribute to current dependent damping.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.