Paper detail

Minimax theory of estimation of linear functionals of the deconvolution density with or without sparsity

The present paper considers a problem of estimating a linear functional $Φ=\int_{-\infty}^\infty φ(x) f(x)dx$ of an unknown deconvolution density $f$ on the basis of i.i.d. observations $Y_i = θ_i + ξ_i$ where $ξ_i$ has a known pdf $g$ and $f$ is the pdf of $θ_i$. Although various aspects and particular cases of this problem have been treated by a number of authors, there are still many gaps. In particular, there are no minimax lower bounds for an estimator of $Φ$ for an arbitrary function $φ$. The general upper risk bounds cover only the case when the Fourier transform of $φ$ exists. Moreover, no theory exists for estimating $Φ$ when vector of observations is sparse. In addition, until now, the related problem of estimation of functionals $Φ_n = n^{-1} \sum_{i=1}^n φ(θ_i)$ in indirect observations have been treated as a separate problem with no connection to estimation of $Φ$. The objective of the present paper is to fill in the gaps and develop the general minimax theory of estimation of $Φ$ and $Φ_n$. We offer a general approach to estimation of $Φ$ (and $Φ_n$) and provide the upper and the minimax lower risk bounds in the case when function $φ$ is square integrable. Furthermore, we extend the theory to the case when Fourier transform of $φ$ does not exist and $Φ$ can be presented as a linear functional of the Fourier transform of $f$ and its derivatives. Finally, we generalize our results to handle the situation when vector $θ$ is sparse. As a direct application of the proposed theory, we obtain multiple new results and automatically recover existing ones for a variety of problems such as estimation of the $(2M+1)$-th absolute moment or a generalized moment of the deconvolution density, estimation of the mixing cdf or estimation of the mixing pdf with classical and Berkson errors.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.