Paper detail

Minimax rates of estimation for high-dimensional linear regression over $\ell_q$-balls

Consider the standard linear regression model $\y = \Xmat \betastar + w$, where $\y \in \real^\numobs$ is an observation vector, $\Xmat \in \real^{\numobs \times \pdim}$ is a design matrix, $\betastar \in \real^\pdim$ is the unknown regression vector, and $w \sim \mathcal{N}(0, σ^2 I)$ is additive Gaussian noise. This paper studies the minimax rates of convergence for estimation of $\betastar$ for $\ell_\rpar$-losses and in the $\ell_2$-prediction loss, assuming that $\betastar$ belongs to an $\ell_{\qpar}$-ball $\Ballq(\myrad)$ for some $\qpar \in [0,1]$. We show that under suitable regularity conditions on the design matrix $\Xmat$, the minimax error in $\ell_2$-loss and $\ell_2$-prediction loss scales as $\Rq \big(\frac{\log \pdim}{n}\big)^{1-\frac{\qpar}{2}}$. In addition, we provide lower bounds on minimax risks in $\ell_{\rpar}$-norms, for all $\rpar \in [1, +\infty], \rpar \neq \qpar$. Our proofs of the lower bounds are information-theoretic in nature, based on Fano's inequality and results on the metric entropy of the balls $\Ballq(\myrad)$, whereas our proofs of the upper bounds are direct and constructive, involving direct analysis of least-squares over $\ell_{\qpar}$-balls. For the special case $q = 0$, a comparison with $\ell_2$-risks achieved by computationally efficient $\ell_1$-relaxations reveals that although such methods can achieve the minimax rates up to constant factors, they require slightly stronger assumptions on the design matrix $\Xmat$ than algorithms involving least-squares over the $\ell_0$-ball.

preprint2009arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors4 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.