Paper detail

Minimax $L_2$-Separation Rate in Testing the Sobolev-Type Regularity of a function

In this paper we study the problem of testing if an $L_2-$function $f$ belonging to a certain $l_2$-Sobolev-ball $B_t(R)$ of radius $R>0$ with smoothness level $t>0$ indeed exhibits a higher smoothness level $s>t$, that is, belongs to $B_s(R)$. We assume that only a perturbed version of $f$ is available, where the noise is governed by a standard Brownian motion scaled by $\frac{1}{\sqrt{n}}$. More precisely, considering a testing problem of the form $$H_0:~f\in B_s(R)~~\mathrm{vs.}~~H_1:~f\in B_t(R),~\inf_{h\in B_s}\Vert f-h\Vert_{L_2}>ρ$$ for some $ρ>0$, we approach the task of identifying the smallest value for $ρ$, denoted $ρ^\ast$, enabling the existence of a test $φ$ with small error probability in a minimax sense. By deriving lower and upper bounds on $ρ^\ast$, we expose its precise dependence on $n$: $$ρ^\ast\sim n^{-\frac{t}{2t+1/2}}.$$ As a remarkable aspect of this composite-composite testing problem, it turns out that the rate does not depend on $s$ and is equal to the rate in signal-detection, i.e. the case of a simple null hypothesis.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.