Paper detail

Minimal Header Overhead for Random Linear Network Coding

The energy used to transmit a single bit of data between the devices in wireless networks is equal to the energy for performing hundreds of instructions in those devices. Thus the reduction of the data necessary to transmit, while keeping the same functionality of the employed algorithms is a formidable and challenging scientific task. We describe an algorithm called Small Set of Allowed Coefficients (SSAC) that produces the shortest header overhead in random linear network coding schemes compared with all other approaches reported in the literature. The header overhead length is 2 to 7 times shorter than the length achieved by related compression techniques. For example, SSAC algorithm compresses the length of the header overhead in a generation of 128 packets to 24 bits, while the closest best result achieved by an algorithm based on error correcting codes has a header overhead length of 84 bits in $GF(16)$ and 224 bits in $GF(256)$. We show that the header length in SSAC does not depend on the size of the finite field where the operations are performed, i.e., it just depends on the number of combined packets $m$.

preprint2016arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.