BZPEERSource author record
Explore this author’s publications, collaborators and research topics. This catalog record has not been claimed by its author.
Catalog footprint
Published work
This paper concerns with the construction of codes over GF(2) which reach the max-flow for single source multicast acyclic networks with delay. The coding is always a bitwise XOR of packets with equal lengths, and is based on highly symmetrical and balanced designs. For certain setups and parameters, our approach offers additional plausible security properties: an adversary needs to eavesdrop at least max-flow links in order to decode at least one original packet.
This paper presents the Coded Packet Transport (CPT) scheme, a novel transport mechanism for Optical Packet/Burst Switched (OPS/OBS) networks. The CPT scheme exploits the combined benefits of source coding by erasure codes and path diversity to provide efficient means for recovering from packet loss due to contentions and path failures, and to provide non-cryptographic secrecy. In the CPT scheme, erasure coding is employed at the OPS/OBS ingress node to form coded packets, which are transmitted on disjoint paths from the ingress node to an egress node in the network. The CPT scheme allows for a unified view of Quality of Service (QoS) in OPS/OBS networks by linking the interactions between survivability, performance and secrecy. We provide analytical models that illustrate how QoS aspects of CPT are affected by the number of disjoint paths, packet overhead and processing delay.
The energy used to transmit a single bit of data between the devices in wireless networks is equal to the energy for performing hundreds of instructions in those devices. Thus the reduction of the data necessary to transmit, while keeping the same functionality of the employed algorithms is a formidable and challenging scientific task. We describe an algorithm called Small Set of Allowed Coefficients (SSAC) that produces the shortest header overhead in random linear network coding schemes compared with all other approaches reported in the literature. The header overhead length is 2 to 7 times shorter than the length achieved by related compression techniques. For example, SSAC algorithm compresses the length of the header overhead in a generation of 128 packets to 24 bits, while the closest best result achieved by an algorithm based on error correcting codes has a header overhead length of 84 bits in GF(16) and 224 bits in GF(256). We show that the header length in SSAC does not depend on the size of the finite field where the operations are performed, i.e., it just depends on the number of combined packets m.
Research graph
Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.
BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.