Paper detail

Mini-Minimax Uncertainty Quantification for Emulators

Consider approximating a "black box" function $f$ by an emulator $\hat{f}$ based on $n$ noiseless observations of $f$. Let $w$ be a point in the domain of $f$. How big might the error $|\hat{f}(w) - f(w)|$ be? If $f$ could be arbitrarily rough, this error could be arbitrarily large: we need some constraint on $f$ besides the data. Suppose $f$ is Lipschitz with known constant. We find a lower bound on the number of observations required to ensure that for the best emulator $\hat{f}$ based on the $n$ data, $|\hat{f}(w) - f(w)| \le ε$. But in general, we will not know whether $f$ is Lipschitz, much less know its Lipschitz constant. Assume optimistically that $f$ is Lipschitz-continuous with the smallest constant consistent with the $n$ data. We find the maximum (over such regular $f$) of $|\hat{f}(w) - f(w)|$ for the best possible emulator $\hat{f}$; we call this the "mini-minimax uncertainty" at $w$. In reality, $f$ might not be Lipschitz or---if it is---it might not attain its Lipschitz constant on the data. Hence, the mini-minimax uncertainty at $w$ could be much smaller than $|\hat{f}(w) - f(w)|$. But if the mini-minimax uncertainty is large, then---even if $f$ satisfies the optimistic regularity assumption---$|\hat{f}(w) - f(w)|$ could be large, no matter how cleverly we choose $\hat{f}$. For the Community Atmosphere Model, the maximum (over $w$) of the mini-minimax uncertainty based on a set of 1154~observations of $f$ is no smaller than it would be for a single observation of $f$ at the centroid of the 21-dimensional parameter space. We also find lower confidence bounds for quantiles of the mini-minimax uncertainty and its mean over the domain of $f$. For the Community Atmosphere Model, these lower confidence bounds are an appreciable fraction of the maximum.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.