Paper detail

Microwave Quenching in DC-biased Coplanar Waveguide Based on $YBa_2Cu_3O_{7-δ}$ Thin Film

In this paper, we report on the results of features in the discovered effect of a strong change in the microwave losses (quenching) in HTS-based coplanar waveguide (CPW) at certain values of the input power $P_{in}$ and direct current (DC) $I_{dc}$. Two waveguides were studied: CPW-150 and CPW-75, fabricated of epitaxial 150 nm and 75 nm YBCO films. The insertion loss of CPW, $IL = 10 lg (P_{out} / P_{in})$, was measured versus both the operating temperature and the bias DC current $I_{dc}$ when a fixed level of the input X-band pulsed MW signal $P_{in}$ was applied. Here $P_{out}$ is the power measured at the CPW output. A pulse duration $τ_i$ was 5 $μs$ with pulse repetition period T = 40 $μs$. Experiments showed a noticeable difference in specific values of $I^*= I_{dc}$ corresponding to the $P_{in}$ dependent quenching phenomenon in CPW-150 and CPW-75. With a weak input signal the difference in behavior of CPWs is anticipated, i.e., quenching occurs at a lower current for thinner film. For $P_{in}>1W$ the situation is opposite, i.e., quenching for CPW-150 takes place at a lower $I^*$. This is explained by stronger microwave heating of CPW-150.

preprint2019arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.