Paper detail

Microscopic study of $^{40}$Ca+$^{58,64}$Ni fusion reactions

Background: Heavy-ion fusion reactions at energies near the Coulomb barrier are influenced by couplings between the relative motion and nuclear intrinsic degrees of freedom of the colliding nuclei. The time-dependent Hartree-Fock (TDHF) theory, incorporating the couplings at the mean-field level, as well as the coupled-channels (CC) method are standard approaches to describe low energy nuclear reactions. Purpose: To investigate the effect of couplings to inelastic and transfer channels on the fusion cross sections for the reactions $^{40}$Ca+$^{58}$Ni and $^{40}$Ca+$^{64}$Ni. Methods: Fusion cross sections around and below the Coulomb barrier have been obtained from coupled-channels (CC) calculations, using the bare nucleus-nucleus potential calculated with the frozen Hartree-Fock method and coupling parameters taken from known nuclear structure data. The fusion thresholds and neutron transfer probabilities have been calculated with the TDHF method. Results: For $^{40}$Ca+$^{58}$Ni, the TDHF fusion threshold is in agreement with the most probable barrier obtained in the CC calculations including the couplings to the low-lying octupole $3_1^{-}$ state for $^{40}$Ca and to the low-lying quadrupole $2_1^{+}$ state for $^{58}$Ni. This indicates that the octupole and quadrupole states are the dominant excitations while neutron transfer is shown to be weak. For $^{40}$Ca+$^{64}$Ni, the TDHF barrier is lower than predicted by the CC calculations including the same inelastic couplings as those for $^{40}$Ca+$^{58}$Ni. TDHF calculations show large neutron transfer probabilities in $^{40}$Ca+$^{64}$Ni which could result in a lowering of the fusion threshold. Conclusions: Inelastic channels play an important role in $^{40}$Ca+$^{58}$Ni and $^{40}$Ca+$^{64}$Ni reactions. The role of neutron transfer channels has been highlighted in $^{40}$Ca+$^{64}$Ni.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.