Paper detail

Microscopic Models for Fusion Categories

This is a PhD Thesis on the connection between subfactors (more precisely, their corresponding fusion categories) and Conformal Field Theory (CFT). Besides being a mathematically interesting topic on its own, subfactors have also attracted the attention of physicists, since there is a conjectured correspondence between these and CFTs. Although there is quite a persuasive body of evidence for this conjecture, there are some gaps: there exists a set of exceptional subfactors with no known counterpart CFT. Hence, it is necessary to develop new techniques for building a CFT from a subfactor. Here, it is useful to study the underlying mathematical structure in more detail: The even parts of every subfactor give rise to two Unitary Fusion Categories (UFCs), and it is a promising direction to study quantum spin systems constructed from these categories to find a connection to CFTs. The simplest example that requires new techniques for building a CFT is the Haagerup subfactor, since it is the smallest subfactor with index larger than 4. In this thesis, we investigate the question whether there is a CFT corresponding to the Haagerup subfactor via lattice models in one and two dimensions. The first task here is to find the F-symbols of the fusion category since these are crucial ingredients for the construction of a physical model in all of the models we consider in this thesis. We then investigate microscopic models such as the golden chain model and the Levin-Wen model in order to find evidence for a corresponding CFT. We find that there is no evidence for a corresponding CFT from the investigation of the UFCs directly and it is necessary to expand these studies to the corresponding unitary modular tensor category, which can, for instance, be obtained via the excitations of the Levin-Wen model.

preprint2021arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.