Paper detail

Microscopic Calculation of $Λ-α$ Folding Potential

We construct a folding potential between the $α$ and $Λ$ particles based on underlying nucleon-nucleon and hyperon-nucleon interactions. Starting from a phenomenological $Λ$-N potential and a Gaussian form of the $α$-particle wave function we obtain for the built $α$-$Λ$ interaction a bound $^5_Λ$He state with the binding energy (3.10 MeV), which is consistent with recent experimental data $3.12 \pm 0.02$ MeV. When in turn an exact solution of the four-body Faddeev-Yakubovsky equation for the $α$-particle calculated with the CDBonn, Nijmegen or Argonne V18 realistic nucleon-nucleon potential is used and the phenomenological Gaussian $Λ$-N potential is replaced by the realistic (Nijmegen NSC97f) potential approximated by a rank-1 separable form, then $^5_Λ$He is overbound. In particular, its binding energy given by the folding potential generated with the $α$ particle wave function based on the CDBonn potential is 7.47 MeV. Although the rank-1 separable $Λ$-N potential reproduces the exact scattering length and the effective range of the original $Λ$-N potential, the overbinding results from the lack of the required repulsive properties in the assumed separable form.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.