Paper detail

Microcanonical Monte Carlo Study of One Dimensional Self-Gravitating Lattice Gas Models

In this study we present a Microcanonical Monte Carlo investigation of one dimensional self-gravitating toy models. We study the effect of hard-core potentials and compare to those results obtained with softening parameters and also the effect of the geometry of the models. In order to study the effect of the geometry and the borders in the system we introduce a model with the symmetry of motion in a line instead of a circle, which we denominate as $1/r$ model. The hard-core particle potential introduces the effect of the size of particles and, consequently, the effect of the density of the system that is redefined in terms of the packing fraction of the system. The latter plays a role similar to the softening parameter $ε$ in the softened particles' case. In the case of low packing fractions both models with hard-core particles show a behavior that keeps the intrinsic properties of the three dimensional gravitational systems such as negative heat capacity. For higher values of the packing fraction the ring the system behaves as the Hamiltonian Mean Field model and while for the $1/r$ it is similar to the one-dimensional systems.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.