Paper detail

Microcanonical analysis of the Curie-Weiss anisotropic quantum Heisenberg model in a magnetic field

The anisotropic quantum Heisenberg model with Curie-Weiss-type interactions is studied analytically in several variants of the microcanonical ensemble. (Non)equivalence of microcanonical and canonical ensembles is investigated by studying the concavity properties of entropies. The microcanonical entropy s(e,m) is obtained as a function of the energy e and the magnetization vector m in the thermodynamic limit. Since, for this model, e is uniquely determined by m, the same information can be encoded either in s(m) or s(e,m1,m2). Although these two entropies correspond to the same physical setting of fixed e and m, their concavity properties differ. The entropy s_h(u), describing the model at fixed total energy u and in a homogeneous external magnetic field h of arbitrary direction, is obtained by reduction from the nonconcave entropy s(e,m1,m2). In doing so, concavity, and therefore equivalence of ensembles, is restored. s_h(u) has nonanalyticities on surfaces of co-dimension 1 in the (u,h)-space. Projecting these surfaces into lower-dimensional phase diagrams, we observe that the resulting phase transition lines are situated in the positive-temperature region for some parameter values, and in the negative-temperature region for others. In the canonical setting of a system coupled to a heat bath of positive temperatures, the nonanalyticities in the microcanonical negative-temperature region cannot be observed, and this leads to a situation of effective nonequivalence even when formal equivalence holds.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.