Paper detail

Metropolis-Hastings Sampling Using Multivariate Gaussian Tangents

We present MH-MGT, a multivariate technique for sampling from twice-differentiable, log-concave probability density functions. MH-MGT is Metropolis-Hastings sampling using asymmetric, multivariate Gaussian proposal functions constructed from Taylor-series expansion of the log-density function. The mean of the Gaussian proposal function represents the full Newton step, and thus MH-MGT is the stochastic counterpart to Newton optimization. Convergence analysis shows that MH-MGT is well suited for sampling from computationally-expensive log-densities with contributions from many independent observations. We apply the technique to Gibbs sampling analysis of a Hierarchical Bayesian marketing effectiveness model built for a large US foodservice distributor. Compared to univariate slice sampling, MH-MGT shows 6x improvement in sampling efficiency, measured in terms of `function evaluation equivalents per independent sample'. To facilitate wide applicability of MH-MGT to statistical models, we prove that log-concavity of a twice-differentiable distribution is invariant with respect to 'linear-projection' transformations including, but not restricted to, generalized linear models.

preprint2013arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.