Paper detail

Metrizable quotients of $C_p$-spaces

The famous Rosenthal-Lacey theorem asserts that for each infinite compact set $K$ the Banach space $C(K)$ admits a quotient which is either a copy of $c$ or $\ell_{2}$. What is the case when the uniform topology of $C(K)$ is replaced by the pointwise topology? Is it true that $C_p(X)$ always has an infinite-dimensional separable (or better metrizable) quotient? In this paper we prove that for a Tychonoff space $X$ the function space $C_p(X)$ has an infinite-dimensional metrizable quotient if $X$ either contains an infinite discrete $C^*$-embedded subspace or else $X$ has a sequence $(K_n)_{n\in\mathbb N}$ of compact subsets such that for every $n$ the space $K_n$ contains two disjoint topological copies of $K_{n+1}$. Applying the latter result, we show that under $\lozenge$ there exists a zero-dimensional Efimov space $K$ whose function space $C_{p}(K)$ has an infinite-dimensional metrizable quotient. These two theorems essentially improve earlier results of Kąkol and Śliwa on infinite-dimensional separable quotients of $C_p$-spaces.

preprint2018arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.