Paper detail

Metrics for Software Process Simulation Modeling

Background: Software Process Simulation (SPS) has become an effective tool for software process management and improvement. However, its adoption in industry is less than what the research community expected due to the burden of measurement cost and the high demand for domain knowledge. The difficulty of extracting appropriate metrics with real data from process enactment is one of the great challenges. Objective: We aim to provide evidence-based support of the process metrics for software process (simulation) modeling. Method: A systematic literature review was performed by extending our previous review series to draw a comprehensive understanding of the metrics for process modeling following a meta-model of ontology of metrics in SPS. Results: We identified 145 process modeling studies that collectively involve 2130 metrics and classified them using the coding technique. Two diagrams which illustrate the high frequency causal relationships used between metrics are proposed in terms of two hierarchical levels of modeling purposes. We revisited the data issues encountered in SPS data preparing phases, as well as identified the corresponding strategies. Conclusion: The results of this study provide process modelers with an evidence-based reference of the identification and the use of metrics in SPS modeling, and further contribute to the development of the body of knowledge on software metrics in the context of process modeling. Furthermore, this study is not limited to process simulation but can be extended to software process modeling, in general. Taking simulation metrics as standards and references can further motivate and guide software developers to improve the collection, governance, and application of process data in practice.

preprint2023arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.