Researcher profile

Liming Dong

Liming Dong contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 11 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
1works
0followers
1topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

1 published item(s)

preprint2023arXiv

Metrics for Software Process Simulation Modeling

Background: Software Process Simulation (SPS) has become an effective tool for software process management and improvement. However, its adoption in industry is less than what the research community expected due to the burden of measurement cost and the high demand for domain knowledge. The difficulty of extracting appropriate metrics with real data from process enactment is one of the great challenges. Objective: We aim to provide evidence-based support of the process metrics for software process (simulation) modeling. Method: A systematic literature review was performed by extending our previous review series to draw a comprehensive understanding of the metrics for process modeling following a meta-model of ontology of metrics in SPS. Results: We identified 145 process modeling studies that collectively involve 2130 metrics and classified them using the coding technique. Two diagrams which illustrate the high frequency causal relationships used between metrics are proposed in terms of two hierarchical levels of modeling purposes. We revisited the data issues encountered in SPS data preparing phases, as well as identified the corresponding strategies. Conclusion: The results of this study provide process modelers with an evidence-based reference of the identification and the use of metrics in SPS modeling, and further contribute to the development of the body of knowledge on software metrics in the context of process modeling. Furthermore, this study is not limited to process simulation but can be extended to software process modeling, in general. Taking simulation metrics as standards and references can further motivate and guide software developers to improve the collection, governance, and application of process data in practice.