Paper detail

Metric ${X}_p$ inequalities

For every $p\in (0,\infty)$ we associate to every metric space $(X,d_X)$ a numerical invariant $\mathfrak{X}_p(X)\in [0,\infty]$ such that if $\mathfrak{X}_p(X)<\infty$ and a metric space $(Y,d_Y)$ admits a bi-Lipschitz embedding into $X$ then also $\mathfrak{X}_p(Y)<\infty$. We prove that if $p,q\in (2,\infty)$ satisfy $q<p$ then $\mathfrak{X}_p(L_p)<\infty$ yet $\mathfrak{X}_p(L_q)=\infty$. Thus our new bi-Lipschitz invariant certifies that $L_q$ does not admit a bi-Lipschitz embedding into $L_p$ when $2<q<p<\infty$. This completes the long-standing search for bi-Lipschitz invariants that serve as an obstruction to the embeddability of $L_p$ spaces into each other, the previously understood cases of which were metric notions of type and cotype, which however fail to certify the nonembeddability of $L_q$ into $L_p$ when $2<q<p<\infty$. Among the consequences of our results are new quantitative restrictions on the bi-Lipschitz embeddability into $L_p$ of snowflakes of $L_q$ and integer grids in $\ell_q^n$, for $2<q<p<\infty$. As a byproduct of our investigations, we also obtain results on the geometry of the Schatten $p$ trace class $S_p$ that are new even in the linear setting.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.