Paper detail

Metaplectic geometrical optics for ray-based modeling of caustics: Theory and algorithms

The optimization of radiofrequency-wave (RF) systems for fusion experiments is often performed using ray-tracing codes, which rely on the geometrical-optics (GO) approximation. However, GO fails at caustics such as cutoffs and focal points, erroneously predicting the wave intensity to be infinite. This is a critical shortcoming of GO, since the caustic wave intensity is often the quantity of interest, e.g. RF heating. Full-wave modeling can be used instead, but the computational cost limits the speed at which such optimizations can be performed. We have developed a less expensive alternative called metaplectic geometrical optics (MGO). Instead of evolving waves in the usual $\textbf{x}$ (coordinate) or $\text{k}$ (spectral) representation, MGO uses a mixed $\textbf{X} \equiv \textsf{A}\textbf{x} + \textsf{B}\textbf{k}$ representation. By continuously adjusting the matrix coefficients $\textsf{A}$ and $\textsf{B}$ along the rays, one can ensure that GO remains valid in the $\textbf{X}$ coordinates without caustic singularities. The caustic-free result is then mapped back onto the original $\textbf{x}$ space using metaplectic transforms. Here, we overview the MGO theory and review algorithms that will aid the development of an MGO-based ray-tracing code. We show how using orthosymplectic transformations leads to considerable simplifications compared to previously published MGO formulas. We also prove explicitly that MGO exactly reproduces standard GO when evaluated far from caustics (an important property which until now has only been inferred from numerical simulations), and we relate MGO to other semiclassical caustic-removal schemes published in the literature. This discussion is then augmented by an explicit comparison of the computed spectrum for a wave bounded between two cutoffs.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.