Paper detail

Meta Sparse Principal Component Analysis

We study the meta-learning for support (i.e. the set of non-zero entries) recovery in high-dimensional Principal Component Analysis. We reduce the sufficient sample complexity in a novel task with the information that is learned from auxiliary tasks. We assume each task to be a different random Principal Component (PC) matrix with a possibly different support and that the support union of the PC matrices is small. We then pool the data from all the tasks to execute an improper estimation of a single PC matrix by maximising the $l_1$-regularised predictive covariance to establish that with high probability the true support union can be recovered provided a sufficient number of tasks $m$ and a sufficient number of samples $ O\left(\frac{\log(p)}{m}\right)$ for each task, for $p$-dimensional vectors. Then, for a novel task, we prove that the maximisation of the $l_1$-regularised predictive covariance with the additional constraint that the support is a subset of the estimated support union could reduce the sufficient sample complexity of successful support recovery to $O(\log |J|)$, where $J$ is the support union recovered from the auxiliary tasks. Typically, $|J|$ would be much less than $p$ for sparse matrices. Finally, we demonstrate the validity of our experiments through numerical simulations.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.