Paper detail

Meta-Causal Feature Learning for Out-of-Distribution Generalization

Causal inference has become a powerful tool to handle the out-of-distribution (OOD) generalization problem, which aims to extract the invariant features. However, conventional methods apply causal learners from multiple data splits, which may incur biased representation learning from imbalanced data distributions and difficulty in invariant feature learning from heterogeneous sources. To address these issues, this paper presents a balanced meta-causal learner (BMCL), which includes a balanced task generation module (BTG) and a meta-causal feature learning module (MCFL). Specifically, the BTG module learns to generate balanced subsets by a self-learned partitioning algorithm with constraints on the proportions of sample classes and contexts. The MCFL module trains a meta-learner adapted to different distributions. Experiments conducted on NICO++ dataset verified that BMCL effectively identifies the class-invariant visual regions for classification and may serve as a general framework to improve the performance of the state-of-the-art methods.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.