Paper detail

Merging Deterministic Policy Gradient Estimations with Varied Bias-Variance Tradeoff for Effective Deep Reinforcement Learning

Deep reinforcement learning (DRL) on Markov decision processes (MDPs) with continuous action spaces is often approached by directly training parametric policies along the direction of estimated policy gradients (PGs). Previous research revealed that the performance of these PG algorithms depends heavily on the bias-variance tradeoffs involved in estimating and using PGs. A notable approach towards balancing this tradeoff is to merge both on-policy and off-policy gradient estimations. However existing PG merging methods can be sample inefficient and are not suitable to train deterministic policies directly. To address these issues, this paper introduces elite PGs and strengthens their variance reduction effect by adopting elitism and policy consolidation techniques to regularize policy training based on policy behavioral knowledge extracted from elite trajectories. Meanwhile, we propose a two-step method to merge elite PGs and conventional PGs as a new extension of the conventional interpolation merging method. At both the theoretical and experimental levels, we show that both two-step merging and interpolation merging can induce varied bias-variance tradeoffs during policy training. They enable us to effectively use elite PGs and mitigate their performance impact on trained policies. Our experiments also show that two-step merging can outperform interpolation merging and several state-of-the-art algorithms on six benchmark control tasks.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Authors

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.