Paper detail

Memoryless nonlinear response: A simple mechanism for the 1/f noise

Discovering the mechanism underlying the ubiquity of $"1/f^α"$ noise has been a long--standing problem. The wide range of systems in which the fluctuations show the implied long--time correlations suggests the existence of some simple and general mechanism that is independent of the details of any specific system. We argue here that a {\it memoryless nonlinear response} suffices to explain the observed non--trivial values of $α$: a random input noisy signal $S(t)$ with a power spectrum varying as $1/f^{α'}$, when fed to an element with such a response function $R$ gives an output $R(S(t))$ that can have a power spectrum $1/f^α$ with $α< α'$. As an illustrative example, we show that an input Brownian noise ($α'=2$) acting on a device with a sigmoidal response function $R(S)= \sgn(S)|S|^x$, with $x<1$, produces an output with $α= 3/2 +x$, for $0 \leq x \leq 1/2$. Our discussion is easily extended to more general types of input noise as well as more general response functions.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.