Paper detail

Melting of Rare-Gas Crystals: Monte Carlo Simulation versus Experiments

We study the melting transition in crystals of rare gas Ar, Xe, and Kr by the use of extensive Monte Carlo simulations with the Lennard-Jones potential. The parameters of this potential have been deduced by Bernardes in 1958 from experiments of rare gas in the gaseous phase. It is amazing that the parameters of such a popular potential were not fully tested so far. In order to carry out precise tests, we have written a high-performance Monte Carlo program which allows in particular to take into account correctly the periodic boundary conditions to reduce surface effects and to reduce CPU time. Using the Bernardes parameters, we find that the melting temperature of several rare gas is from 13 to 20% higher than that obtained from experiments. We have throughout studied the case of Ar by examining both finite-size and cutoff-distance effects. In order to get a good agreement with the experimental melting temperature, we propose a modification of these parameters to describe better the melting of rare-gas crystals.

preprint2012arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.