Paper detail

Mechanical properties of polycrystalline graphene based on a realistic atomistic model

Graphene can at present be grown at large quantities only by the chemical vapor deposition method, which produces polycrystalline samples. Here, we describe a method for constructing realistic polycrystalline graphene samples for atomistic simulations, and apply it for studying their mechanical properties. We show that cracks initiate at points where grain boundaries meet and then propagate through grains predominantly in zigzag or armchair directions, in agreement with recent experimental work. Contrary to earlier theoretical predictions, we observe normally distributed intrinsic strength (~ 50% of that of the mono-crystalline graphene) and failure strain which do not depend on the misorientation angles between the grains. Extrapolating for grain sizes above 15 nm results in a failure strain of ~ 0.09 and a Young's modulus of ~ 600 GPa. The decreased strength can be adequately explained with a conventional continuum model when the grain boundary meeting points are identified as Griffith cracks.

preprint2012arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.