Paper detail

Measuring Understanding Through Discrete Compositional Knowledge Structures in Hierarchical Automata

How do we measure genuine understanding in artificial cognitive systems? Current approaches face a measurement gap: probabilistic systems refine confidence gradually, practice-based systems compile knowledge through repeated execution, and neural systems distribute understanding across opaque embedding spaces. We propose that making understanding measurable requires architectures where understanding formation produces discrete, inspectable structural signatures. This paper presents hierarchical automata built from finite state machines representing patterns and higher-order automata representing compositions. Constrained inference constructs automata from single observations. Similarity detection clusters related automata, making concept robustness quantifiable. Graph memory makes compositional knowledge directly inspectable. Metacognitive mechanisms enable observable reconfiguration. We demonstrate understanding measurement in a simple geometric domain. Graph evolution tracking reveals five measurable signatures: immediate representation formation, structural knowledge, generalization capacity, compositional awareness, and metacognitive access. These measurements distinguish structural understanding from statistical correlation. Our contribution is a framework for making understanding measurable through discrete compositional knowledge structures. This measurement capability complements perceptual learning in neural systems and task execution in neurosymbolic architectures.

preprint2026arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Authors

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.