Paper detail

Measuring of $|V_{ub}|$ in the forthcoming decade

I first introduce the importance of measuring V_ub precisely. Then, from a theoretician's point of view, I review (a) past history, (b) present trials, and (c) possible future alternatives on measuring |V_ub| and/or |V_ub/V_cb|. As of my main topic, I introduce a model-independent method, which predicts Γ(B -> X_u l ν) / Γ(B -> X_c l ν) \equiv (γ_u / γ_c) \times | V_{ub} / V_{cb}|^2 \simeq (1.83 \pm 0.28) \times |V_ub / V_cb|^2 and |V_ub/V_cb| \equiv (γ_c / γ_u)^{1/2} \times [{\cal{B}}(B -> X_u l ν)/{\cal{B}}(B -> X_c l ν)]^{1/2} \simeq (0.74 \pm 0.06) \times [{\cal{B}}(B -> X_u l ν)/ {\cal{B}}(B -> X_c l ν)]^{1/2}, based on the heavy quark effective theory. I also explore the possible experimental options to separate B -> X_u l νfrom the dominant B -> X_c l ν: the measurement of inclusive hadronic invariant mass distributions, and the `D - π' (and `K - π') separation conditions. I also clarify the relevant experimental backgrounds.

preprint1997arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Authors

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.