Paper detail

Measurements of the Ground-State Polarizabilities of Cs, Rb, and K using Atom Interferometry

We measured the ground-state static electric-dipole polarizabilities of Cs, Rb, and K atoms using a three-nanograting Mach-Zehnder atom beam interferometer. Our measurements provide benchmark tests for atomic structure calculations and thus test the underlying theory used to interpret atomic parity non-conservation experiments. We measured $α_{\mathrm{Cs}} = 4πε_0 \times 59.45(11) Å^3$, $α_{\mathrm{Rb}} = 4πε_0 \times 47.44(9) Å^3$, and $α_{\mathrm{K}} = 4πε_0 \times 42.97(8) Å^3$. In atomic units, these measurements are $α_{\mathrm{Cs}} = 401.2(7)$, $α_{\mathrm{Rb}} = 320.1(6)$, and $α_{\mathrm{K}} = 290.0(5)$. We report ratios of polarizabilities $α_{\mathrm{Cs}}/α_{\mathrm{Rb}} = 1.2532(10)$, $α_{\mathrm{Cs}}/α_{\mathrm{K}} = 1.3835(9)$, and $α_{\mathrm{Rb}}/α_{\mathrm{K}} = 1.1040(9)$ with smaller fractional uncertainty because the systematic errors for individual measurements are largely correlated. Since Cs atom beams have short de Broglie wavelengths, we developed measurement methods that do not require resolved atom diffraction. Specifically, we used phase choppers to measure atomic beam velocity distributions, and we used electric field gradients to give the atom interference pattern a phase shift that depends on atomic polarizability.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access5 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.